Parthenons In Athens Rome free essay sample

Compares ancient monuments histories, cultural, architectural political significance, styles, space and features. The Parthenon in Athens and the Pantheon in Rome are two of the greatest surviving monuments of ancient civilizations. Though they came from very different cultures, the two buildings have a great deal in common. Both monuments were symbols of the political goals of the rulers who built them. Each building is also considered the ultimate achievement of a period in architectural history. But, the two monuments also demonstrate differences between Greek and Roman ideas about architecture and the state. The two monuments have similar recent histories. Both are so well preserved because they were adapted by later cultures. The Parthenon was the only temple ever to be used by four different religions (ancient Greek, Catholic, Greek Orthodox, and Islam). The survival of the Pantheon was due to its use by the..

A comparsion Between Modern Day Soilders and Medieval Knights essays

A comparsion Between Modern Day Soilders and Medieval Knights essays In Medieval Times, A Knight was a mounted man-at-arms of medieval Europe. He served a king or other feudal superior, usually in return for the tenure of a tract of land, but sometimes he served his lord for money. The knight was generally a man of noble birth who had served in the lower ranks as page and squire before being ceremoniously inducted into knighthood by his superior. At his induction the knight usually swore to be brave, loyal, and courteous and to protect the defenseless. After the 15th century, knighthood was conferred on civilians as a reward for public services. A knight in armor would present a very strange appearance on a modern battlefield. His prancing steed and metal coat of mail, the heavy iron helmet that covered his head, the shield that he carried on his left arm, his lance and shining sword-all of these belong to bygone days and have little place among the swift airplanes, the rapid-shooting automatic weapons, and the scorching flame-throwers of modern warfare. Knighthood flourished before the time of guns and gunpowder when battles still were won by hand-to-hand conflicts of heavy-armored knights. Even in peacetime knights looked for conflicts in which to engage. Fighting was almost an everyday occurrence, and the common people generally could not protect themselves against an invading foe. In times of danger they fled to the castles or strongholds owned by the nobles. To obtain protection the poorer folk became the serfs or villains of their powerful neighbors, and those in turn were the vassals of those still more powerful. The institution of knighthood In modern-day Britain, knighthood is an honor conferred by the monarch on both men and women in recognition of outstanding personal merit. The knight is usually created through appointment to an order of knighthood. The title sir or dame is prefixed to his or her first name ...

Final project Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 3

Final project - Essay Example The first part of the paper discusses in detail the views of the author towards his philosophy. The second part of the paper will present a counter argument of Friedman’s philosophy. In a free market economy, businesses should utilise the existing market forces to generate as much profits as they can from their operations. Friedman argues that â€Å"The businessmen believe that they are defending free en ­terprise when they declaim that business is not concerned "merely" with profit but also with promoting desirable "social" ends; that business has a "social conscience" and takes seriously its responsibilities for providing em ­ployment, eliminating discrimination†¦Ã¢â‚¬  He goes on to state that only people have responsibilities not a corporation which is an artificial person. In other words, a corporate has artificial responsibilities which means that business as a whole cannot be said to have any responsibilities. The main argument here is that corporate leaders have a responsibility to their employers and that responsibility is to make as much money as possible from the operations of business. The manager of such corporate is an agent of the peopl e who own the business and he has a responsibility to them not the society. As an individual, the manager of the corporate can have responsibilities such as assisting the need but he should do it from his own money not the company’s. Spending other people’s money according to Friedman is not the responsibility of the leader who should serve the best interests of the owners of business. In other words, the executive is just an agent acting on behalf of his principal. According to the author of the above mentioned article, it becomes a political principle to make expenditures to foster social objectives. Friedman argues that there are people who are elected into office to serve that purpose